Are we in a recession or not? What two main financial indicators can inform us. : Planet Cash : NPR




This week, we acquired two necessary developments in our ongoing nationwide what the heck is happening on this financial system saga. First, on Wednesday, the Federal Reserve once more raised rates of interest by three-quarters of a proportion level – one other tick upward in its ongoing battle to scale back the speed of inflation. Then on Thursday, the Bureau of Financial Evaluation launched numbers that say gross home product – GDP – declined by an annualized fee of 0.9%. All of the whereas, the White Home and the Fed say we’re not in a recession – but. Woof.

Good day, and welcome to PLANET MONEY. I am Wailin Wong. If all of those developments depart your head spinning, don’t fret. Our each day podcast, The Indicator, is right here to assist. Right this moment on the present, we’ve two tales about among the numbers we pay closest consideration to whereas measuring the well being of our financial system – the CPI, or Client Worth Index, and the GDP. We will discover what these numbers truly imply and in addition whether or not we ought to be occupied with them in another way. Adrian Ma and I begin by taking a look at how looking for groceries would possibly have an effect on inflation with out truly contributing to economists’ most well-liked measure of inflation. That is after the break.


WONG: Inflation is working at 9%. That is the headline determine you see in every single place. However economists are inclined to deal with a unique measure of inflation known as core CPI. That quantity is 6%. It is completely different from the headline CPI determine as a result of it leaves out a few issues that truly take up a giant chunk of family budgets – gasoline and groceries.


And out of these two classes, groceries are actually the place everyone feels the pinch of inflation – proper? – except, like, you are a kind of individuals who does not eat meals.

WONG: (Laughter).

MA: And the final feeling of getting hit by inflation, that’s one thing that’s actually necessary to the Fed. And that’s due to the best way shoppers really feel about costs and the place they’re headed. These emotions form habits. And that is known as inflation expectations.

WONG: Econ vocab of the day. This is a basic instance. If individuals imagine inflation might be greater sooner or later, they will ask for a elevate at work. Firms then elevate their costs to offset greater labor prices, making a cycle that results in extra inflation.

MA: And because of this the Fed carefully watches and tries to handle inflation expectations. They do not need anticipation of upper costs to really turn into greater costs. And but, economists’ most well-liked inflation quantity to the core CPI – it ignores meals costs.

WONG: And there is a motive why core CPI excludes meals and power. Their costs are usually unstable. They fluctuate a lot that together with them in CPI may paint a deceptive image of inflation developments. They may possibly idiot you into pondering that general costs are going up or down extra shortly than they really are.

ULRIKE MALMENDIER: Nevertheless, possibly unintended aspect impact of that has been that the measure of inflation we deal with doesn’t mirror the truth we shoppers reside in.

MA: Ulrike Malmendier is a professor of economics and finance at UC Berkeley. And she or he says it simply does not work to inform individuals to deal with sure costs and never others.

MALMENDIER: These each day alerts we get, they only change us. They have an effect on our mind, and does not even should do with whether or not you had been taught issues or not taught issues, how sensible you’re. And so by now, I do know that it’s of utmost necessary to not, , speak all the way down to shoppers and attempt to speak them out of taking a look at grocery costs. If you wish to perceive what’s going on inside and the selections they are going to make, they should take it tremendous severely.

WONG: And Ulrike, she did take grocery costs tremendous severely. A couple of years in the past, she and another economists got here up with a pair new measures of inflation that focus simply on grocery objects. They tracked real-life costs by utilizing Nielsen information that got here from customers taking handheld scanners to the grocery retailer.

MALMENDIER: We mentioned, all proper, let’s deal with groceries. And furthermore, let’s, , use this very cool information we acquired and calculate family by family how costs for the objects improve.

WONG: Ulrike and her colleagues additionally surveyed these Nielsen customers about their notion of previous and future inflation. What do you suppose inflation was over the past 12 months, and what do you suppose it will likely be within the subsequent 12 months?

MA: And what they discovered was a powerful correlation between grocery costs and inflation expectations. So in different phrases, taking a look at adjustments in grocery costs – this class that doesn’t seem within the core CPI quantity – it was a terrific predictor for inflation expectations. Folks had been getting worth alerts beamed into their brains every time they made journeys to the grocery store, and that was driving how they felt about future worth will increase.

WONG: The researchers then dove in additional to have a look at, OK, who’s truly doing the grocery buying in a family? Who’s getting these worth alerts?

LAUREN SEEGERS: So I am Lauren Seegers. I reside in Oak Park. And I store at Dealer Joe’s so much.

WONG: In a whole lot of instances, it is of us like Lauren. The opposite day, I met up together with her at a suburban Chicago grocery retailer.

SEEGERS: My husband, he hates grocery buying. I truly prefer it.


SEEGERS: And so I do it.

WONG: She has a 1-year-old son who began consuming strong meals simply six months in the past, so you’ll be able to think about how her invoice has been rising.

SEEGERS: On my record right this moment – let’s have a look at – we’ve avocados. I feel I…

WONG: He goes by a pound of avocados in per week.

MA: That’s a whole lot of guacamole.

WONG: (Laughter) Yeah. He is making it tableside, .

SEEGERS: And my sense at first was like, he is so small. How a lot can he eat? Rather a lot (laughter).

WONG: That is, like, your solely job at that age, is simply to, like, eat and be cute.


WONG: So Lauren is the first shopper within the household, and meaning she may be very conscious of how a lot groceries price. Like, at Dealer Joe’s, she pays $6 for a giant seedless watermelon. It feels steep, nevertheless it’s not as a lot because the $12 watermelon her husband lately acquired at a unique grocery store.

SEEGERS: Proper. He got here residence, and I used to be like, take that again.

WONG: Did you actually? Did he…

SEEGERS: I imply, he did not, however…


SEEGERS: However that is a lot. Nonetheless, $6 for this. I really feel like this type of a watermelon was, like, three. Proper?

WONG: Lauren says it seems like the worth of watermelon has gone up so much. Now, take that feeling she has about watermelon and multiply it by the opposite objects in her cart – avocados, natural milk, floor turkey. Then take into consideration these emotions percolating in grocery shops all throughout the nation. It is like a tidal wave of emotions that economist Ulrike Malmendier’s analysis reveals has a huge effect on inflation expectations, which, keep in mind, may drive inflation greater.

MA: However can we all expertise these emotions the identical? One issue Ulrike has zeroed in on that appears to make a distinction is gender. So there’s historic information exhibiting that ladies are inclined to really feel extra pessimistic about future inflation than males.

MALMENDIER: All kinds of hypotheses had been proposed for that. Oh, girls have much less monetary literacy, much less training. Perhaps girls are innately extra pessimistic about the way forward for the financial system. We thought, how about girls being bombarded with these worth alerts from grocery buying, however males, not less than historically, not doing that a lot?

MA: That could be a good level. I imply, Ulrike and her colleagues dove again into her grocery analysis. And keep in mind, they’ve already found that grocery costs had been a powerful predictor of inflation expectations. Now they had been including gender roles to the combo.

WONG: And this is what they discovered. To begin with, inside heterosexual married {couples}, there was a big gender hole in inflation expectations. Wives persistently anticipated greater inflation than their husbands. Now, right here comes the dramatic half – in households the place males did not grocery store, this gender hole in inflation expectations nearly doubled. After which in households the place the spouses shared grocery buying extra equally, the gender hole – it disappeared.

MA: Simply poof – no extra gender hole. So it is like this mundane family chore was massively necessary for a way individuals expertise the financial system and the way they really feel about it.

WONG: Whenever you first noticed the numbers, had been you want, I acquired to run these once more?

MALMENDIER: Precisely. No, that was precisely proper. You may see there’s been some noise within the reply – possibly, , a person not desirous to admit that, , he mainly by no means does the grocery buying, or possibly a lady exaggerating, like, how a lot she does. However that is not the case right here.

MA: It wasn’t a matter of monetary literacy or training stage both. Mainly, grocery costs had been chargeable for how girls felt about future inflation. And ladies who had been the only or major grocery customers of their households felt method worse about inflation than their companions.

WONG: Ulrike says, teasing out how gender roles form inflation expectations may go a good distance in understanding the financial selections that folks make.

MALMENDIER: Take into consideration labor provide, notably when you’ve got youngsters, possibly, whether or not you keep at residence. And that might be influenced by the way you suppose costs and wages will improve sooner or later – how a lot you put money into your training, occupied with how a lot that may pay out. So actually necessary selections might be affected by these variations in expectations. And I feel financial policymakers understanding that is tremendous useful.

MA: Jerome Powell, should you’re listening, possibly maintain the subsequent Fed governors assembly at a grocery store. You will get your weekly buying accomplished on the similar time.

WONG: Yeah. Tell us how a lot a watermelon prices in Washington, D.C.


WONG: Arising after the break, Greg Rosalsky and Adrian Ma take a look at how essentially the most basic measurement of the well being of our financial system – the GDP – could be due for a revolution.



For the second quarter in a row, financial progress in the USA has declined. That is in keeping with a preliminary estimate launched this week by the Bureau of Financial Evaluation. It says gross home product – GDP – declined by an annualized fee of 0.9%.

MA: And now the controversy begins for actual. Are we in a recession? Some are saying sure. We now have had two consecutive quarters of damaging progress. Others are like, no method. It isn’t a recession but.

ROSALSKY: On the middle of this debate is that this indicator, this quantity, good old style GDP, gross home product.

MA: However there’s additionally an issue with GDP. It is only one quantity – a single quantity that tells us the entire dimension of the financial system. And that quantity misses so much – like, for example, how completely different earnings teams are doing.

ROSALSKY: A staff of economists needs to revolutionize the best way the federal government measures the financial system. They think about a brand new form of GDP, one which is not merely a single quantity telling us about whole financial progress however a set of numbers telling us the place the positive aspects from that progress are flowing. And fairly cool – they have already got a working prototype.

MA: And to place it in phrases that translate to audio, you’ll be able to consider basic GDP as a easy melody – one word at a time.


MA: And in contrast, you’ll be able to consider the brand new GDP prototype as one thing like a chord development.


ROSALSKY: It is GDP, the remix.

MA: Remix.


ROSALSKY: So to grasp the change these economists need, it is price going again in time to see how we even initially acquired GDP within the first place – , the easy melody model. It started within the early Nineteen Thirties, when the U.S. financial system was dealing with this nightmare often known as the Nice Melancholy.


UNIDENTIFIED PERSON: Hundreds of thousands of People – males, girls and kids – wait within the chilly on bread strains, in soup kitchens.

ROSALSKY: So the federal authorities enlists this younger economist named Simon Kuznets to determine simply how dangerous the harm from the Nice Melancholy was. By the best way, it’s best to try our PLANET MONEY Summer season Faculty sequence. There is a latest episode all about Kuznets and GDP. It is price a pay attention. We’re simply doing the shorter model right here.

MA: Again then, the federal government didn’t monitor the financial system in a brilliant rigorous method. And, in truth, for a very long time, the very idea of this single nationwide entity often known as the financial system was kind of an alien idea to lots of people, not less than within the trendy sense that we discuss it.

ROSALSKY: So Simon Kuznets and a staff of nerds, they get to work. And I acquired to say, like, particularly within the time earlier than computer systems, this work will need to have been excruciatingly boring. We’re speaking, like, sifting by papers, counting issues within the financial system, compiling statistics – like, fairly dry stuff.

MA: Their abacuses had been most likely, like, smoking. However lastly, in 1934, after months and months of heroic nerdery, Kuznets delivered a report back to Congress. And it was titled “Nationwide Revenue, 1929-1932.” And what it did was present the federal authorities with the primary complete accounting system to measure the financial system.

ROSALSKY: The report launched America to a brand new idea – that you could dimension up the nation’s complete financial system with a single quantity. Again then, Kuznets known as it nationwide earnings. But it surely was a forerunner to an idea that right this moment we name GDP. Kuznets’s quantity turned kind of a sensation. His boring report turned a bestseller. The primary 4,500 copies offered out, and it needed to be reprinted – severely.

MA: Swiftly, the nation had a extra scientific approach to estimate financial progress – to evaluate leaders and insurance policies on their financial efficiency, and to determine whether or not they need to change course. And earlier than too lengthy, the quantity was adopted by mainly each nation on earth.

ROSALSKY: However within the very report back to Congress by which Kuznets pioneered the measurement of GDP, he additionally cautioned towards placing an excessive amount of inventory in it. As he mentioned, this single metric solely estimates the scale of the financial system, not the well-being of society. To get at that, we have to know rather more, particularly who’s benefiting or not benefiting from financial progress.

MA: And regardless of that and a complete lengthy line of economists saying, pay attention, GDP shouldn’t be the end-all be-all of the financial dialog, that indicator – GDP – nonetheless continues to dominate the dialog. And that’s the reason a staff of economists at UC Berkeley is attempting to alter that.

GABRIEL ZUCMAN: The massive drawback is that GDP information does not inform you who’s benefiting from financial system progress.

MA: Gabriel Zucman is a part of a trio of economists attempting to revolutionize GDP, together with Thomas Blanchet and Emmanuel Saez. They provide a brand new GDP prototype – , the remix.

ROSALSKY: This prototype breaks down information in financial progress and sees the place the positive aspects from that progress are going. They publish all of it on a web site known as

MA: Now, right here within the U.S., in fact, we have already got a ton of information on inequality. The issue, Gabriel says, is that it often takes a 12 months or two for this information to be up to date. And that’s simply method too gradual for a fast-moving world.

ZUCMAN: A part of the motivation for this undertaking was the COVID-19 pandemic, the place you’ve gotten this dramatic disaster and financial shock, and policymakers are at the hours of darkness, , to some extent. Like, , is it sufficient to create all these new transfers and rising packages, or is it not sufficient?

MA: So to observe the place all these slices of financial pie are going, Gabriel and his colleagues have cobbled collectively information from a complete number of official sources and pioneered a technique to compute how completely different earnings teams are doing economically method faster than has been accomplished earlier than. So that they hope the federal government will observe go well with.

ZUCMAN: So we would like to have the ability to produce numbers about how earnings is rising for every social group on the precise time when the Bureau of Financial Evaluation releases its official GDP progress numbers.

ROSALSKY: So this prototype shouldn’t be that quick but. GDP for the second quarter, in spite of everything, simply got here out, and the prototype has not been up to date but. They simply have numbers for the primary quarter. Have slightly endurance, individuals.

MA: However, , this prototype can already inform us some actually necessary issues concerning the latest previous. Gabriel and his colleagues have used it to look again in historical past and see how completely different earnings teams have fared throughout previous recessions and recoveries.

ZUCMAN: One very placing illustration is what occurred after the Nice Recession of 2008, 2009. GDP recovered in about 4 years. But it surely took greater than 10 years for the underside 50% to get well its pre-Nice Recession earnings stage. So that you had a large disconnect between, , how GDP was rising and the way earnings was rising for a lot of the inhabitants.

ROSALSKY: Examine that to the pandemic recession and restoration. In response to their prototype, it took 20 months for the underside 50% to get well to their pre-crisis earnings stage. That was about twice so long as it took for the highest 50% to get well.

MA: However over the past 12 months or so, it has been the poorer half of America, for as soon as, that has been bettering their place. Surging incomes have helped push them nearer to the richer half of People, and a part of that was as a result of lots of people had been getting pandemic advantages from the federal government.

ROSALSKY: However even after these had been rolled again, a brilliant tight labor market has been serving to to push their incomes up. In the meantime, Gabriel’s tracker reveals the wealthy have been seeing their incomes decline largely as a result of the inventory market has tanked.

MA: It is a fairly extraordinary change from the previous 40 years the place the underside has seen little or no earnings progress and the highest has seen huge positive aspects.

ROSALSKY: However there’s additionally the opposite aspect of the coin of those wage will increase for low-income People. Proof suggests it is one motive why inflation has been surging. Macroeconomic idea has lengthy mentioned there is a tradeoff between a brilliant tight labor market – , the place wages are surging – and inflation.

ZUCMAN: Look – like everyone, I dislike inflation. But when it is a worth to pay for positive aspects for teams which have been excluded from progress, let’s focus on. I feel the software that we’re attempting to develop is exactly what is going to make it attainable to have an knowledgeable debate about these tradeoffs.

ROSALSKY: And this software already seems to be a part of the controversy. When Gabriel and his colleagues first launched it earlier this 12 months, the Biden White Home jumped on the probability to spotlight the positive aspects it reveals for working-class People. It was kind of a proof of idea.

MA: And that is a giant deal – proper? – as a result of for Gabriel and his trio, it wasn’t simply sufficient to make the remix. The hope was that folks would truly pay attention.


WONG: That was Adrian Ma and Greg Rosalsky. These episodes of The Indicator had been produced by senior producer Viet Le and Jamila Huxtable with engineering assist from Debbie Daughtry and Robert Rodriguez. They had been fact-checked by Kathryn Yang. Kate Concannon edits the present.

I am Wailin Wong. That is NPR. Thanks for listening.

Copyright © 2022 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at for additional data.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content is probably not in its closing kind and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability might fluctuate. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.

Leave a Comment